Vivienne Holm wants a practicing certificate – Really?

“Vivienne Holm seeks a new practicing certificate

vivienne-holmYesterday I was approached by Net safe , who on behalf of Vivienne Holm sought changes to  former  blog posts  because Vivienne after holding a practicing certificate for  the past 10 years suddenly cant get one because of  something that was written   many years ago . Vivienne   is seeking  changes to the blog.   We are happy to make corrections  but  there is nothing to correct .   we are interested however in  addressing   injustices  and  if she feels that the comment   is an injustice then she can assit in correcting a far greater injustice  before we  look at the perception she has of tiny little one .

Summary  of Blogs which mention Vivienne

About AWINZ – Animal welfare institute of New Zealand  see also my affidavit

Intimidation by Vivienne HOLM ( Vivienne Parre ) ( Vivienne Wright )

Talking Works Tom Didovich!

How could A non existent private law enforcement authority survive for so long? Why condone corruption in Waitakere City?

Open letter to Wyn Hoadley councillor TCDC

Did David Neutze check the facts before he acted?

Is Wyn Hoadley fit to be a Lawyer, A trustee or a councillor?

How to get your litigation funded through the public purse

More submissions

The following is my response to Net safe  ,  The fact that Vivienne  and Malcolm North who has been  harassing me,   both worked at the ministry of social development   is a fact that is not  lost on me .

….Thank you net safe 

The animal welfare Institute of New Zealand (AWINZ )  had law enforcement powers  which it obtained after  an application was made   to the then  minister  of agriculture on 22 November 1999 .

A blank trust deed  had been attached to the application made by Neil Edward wells a barrister .

In reality ,No trust existed  and  no entity existed but the government  gave  AWINZ wide sweeping law enforcement powers akin to those held by the RNZSPCA, which includes search and seizure and ability to  fine people .

Neil Wells who applied on behalf of AWINZ had written the   no 1 bill for the  new Animal welfare act  and had inserted the  sections to  facilitate the application he subsequently made   and  he  also advised on  the act  as “independent advisor” to the select committee without declaring his obvious conflict of interest of writing an act  to facilitate his own business plan

In March 2006  an  employee  of Waitakere city council   Lynne McDonald ( the bird lady ) approached me with the concern that she, a dog control officer,  was required to  “ volunteer “ her council paid time to AWINZ and prioritise animal welfare over   dog control . The building at  the council  had been   rebranded   and  Neil wells her council manager from 2005  was the only person operating AWINZ   for which he used a logo which was  identical to the new branding of the council building .

Maf at the time of an audit acknowledged that the two   entities appeared to  merge and it was difficult to see where  one   began and the other finished.  The council on the other  hand denied that AWINZ operated from their premises . This  was  in reality a massive public fraud  using   public office for private pecuniary gain.

To prove that AWINZ  did not exist  several of us incorporated the name Animal Welfare institute of New Zealand  .It is impossible to incorporate the  identical name of  an entity, we were successful  there by conclusively proving that  AWINZ  the law enforcement authority did not exist .

Vivienne Holm @ Vivienne Parr @ Vivienne Wright   Phoned me late at night and made threats  against my Private investigators licence  and there by my income and livelihood.  She demanded that we had to give up the name AWINZ  when intimidation did not work Her then husband  Nick wright then   took over the matter  as Vivienne at the time  was working as a law clerk .

I called at her address to discuss a resolution and was promptly served with a trespass notice.

Now it has always puzzled me   why a Law clerk was instructed , surely that is not usual  and  why was her   first port of call  be an intimidating phone call late on a Friday night .. I thought that  a legitmaley instructed   person would use more transparent means  rather than acting like a thug.

After her husband  , a resource management lawyer  , became involved Threats of legal action were made  and out of the blue a trust deed materialised.

I was to find that the trust deed  dated 1.3.2000   had been signed when the  then dog control manager at Waitakere city council, Tom Didovich  visited the   various people who thought they were trustees.

However  they never met  never passed a resolution and certainly were not involved in the application  for the  “ approved organisation’  under section 121 of the animal welfare act  ( which Neil wells had had such a massive part in ), the trust they  were allegedly involved in held no assets  and  after  three years the trustees who  still had not met  were not reappointed, hence this was a totally sham trust

Nick Wright took me to court for defamation ,  for saying that AWINZ was a sham trust, which it was  and has proved to be . The defamation was allegedly of Neil Wells  , I was denied the right  to a  statutory defence of truth and honest opinion and no finding has ever been made that I defamed Neil wells  but I had to pay  some $100,000 to him and his  lawyer  all   for  being a whistle-blower on serious corruption .

This  went on for  some 10 years  the object was to bankrupt me . Neil wells in an email to MAF in 2007    said that this was his objective , he certainly tried hard enough

Nick wright  who is reputedly the “Auckland lawyer who had “fallen on hard times”( has  ceased practicing   and Brookfields continued  their attack on me, I can only guess that if they had done the decent thing they  would have seen some notable  lawyers  struck off  for not checking the facts  before  filing matters in court and using their office contrary to the provisions of the Lawyers and conveyancers rules .

In the process of suing me they used dirty  tactics because  facts and evidence would not have won it for them . I have reason to believe that that  also worked  covertly on my marriage and ensured that  my 23 years marriage and my family was destroyed.   The lawyer who represented me was later found to be incompetent  and I  very much suspect he was working for the other side . So I lost ,  no way of winning when you have  a lawyer who the law society acknowledged as being incompetent and for whom judges had no respect .

All in all this created a massive miscarriage of justice   and one which I physically paid out well  over $300,000  for and   find it impossible to quantify the lost   hours of work, health    stress etc.

Brookfields, on  behalf of whom Vivienne Wright at the time,(previously Vivienne  Parr   now Vivienne Holm)  , took instructions from the fictional AWINZ  tried to liquidate my company and succeeded    until I found out that they  had  filed a false affidavit of service  and the whole thing was reversed.

So now 10 years  down the track and after having held  many  practicing certificates Vivienne  wants a different type of practicing certificate   because she is going to work  for Paul Cavanagh  who   retired exactly a year ago  .

Vivienne “ believes “   that she   already had her application in .  I am sure that she did not.( this is based on my concurrent records  )

I believe that  my post is   totally accurate  and that the fact  of   the date of her application for a  practicing certificate is   just a teensy weensy  bit  trivial compared to the  years of suffering which I and my family  have had to endure.

The good news is that I am happy to  work with  any one  who helps put things right . When the AWINZ matter has been addressed  and is history I can take down all the posts  but while the injustice   exists it requires exposure  of the fact  and   the facts will remain in the public realm

I cannot understand why she claims that  she   cannot get a practicing certificate on this occasion   , the  email you sent is dated 19 September 2016    and states that she  has held a practicing certificate  from April 2015 to the present .

Practicing certificates  renew at the end of June ,  The law society have just informed me that she does not currently hold a  practicing certificate, her last one expired 25 November  2016, it appears that that is the date when she left the MSD

My internet search reveals that  Paul Cavanagh QC  retired a year ago .

It would appear that Vivienne Holm  now wants to work in public practice again , as such she will  become an officer of the high court   and according to section 4 of the  Lawyers and conveyancers act will  have an  obligation to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice in New Zealand:

She may  wish to  help address the  AWINZ injustice ,  once that  has been sorted I can look at removing / altering  blogs .

I do find it amusing perhaps coincidental perhaps not , that  she was  employed by MSD   until 25 November where Malcolm North  who has been harassing me, by email   also works.

But getting back to Vivienne    I am happy to   remove  anything minor when  a greater injustice has been resolved, she only needs to contact me  and help me    right the wrongs  of the past  that she was instrumental in in  kicking off .      A person with integrity   would  see  that an as officer of the court  Vivienne  would  have an overriding obligation  to  justice  and if she cannot how integrity in   putting the past right  then she should not be asking me  to change factual information .

In the interest of transparency  I will be publishing this on


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

I do believe in Justice, I do, I do

We have laws for a reason, do we not?  Legal documents are written up they way they are to protect parties from deceit and wrongdoing.  Or so I thought anyway.

I had an agreement for sale and purchase on my house and there was a clause written into which read:


This clause is added to protect the purchaser.  I am happy for this report to carried out, I know my house has no major issues, and no problems with leaks, the roof is all good.  It is insulated in the ceiling and under the floor.  It has some minor issues, just like every house does.  So I’m all good for “a Registered Master Builder, Building Certifier or other qualified specialist” to inspect my house.  As it turns out, the clause is also there to protect the vendor.  I expect the specialist report will look something like this (click link below).

Instead this is the report from the “specialist” that I discover has been accepted by the prospective purchasers:


…and all this is as an itemised account of what the so called “specialist” thinks inside his mental brain.  He has undertaken no investigation, he has not gone underneath my house and inspected the foundations, but he has estimated $5-$10K for remedy, he has guessed that the laundry floor has water damage, because the lino is lifted.  In fact I had the laundry/toilet floor replaced with ply board, after my cylinder collapsed a couple of years back.  He states the “particle board” has water damage.  Well hello, guess work is unacceptable for a building report…a proper one that is!  He says my roller sliding door has expired (whatever that is)!  I presume he is talking about my garage door… and dah it has not expired.  It is all in working order, I don’t have it plugged it though, perhaps that is what he means.

On we go… he says my cladding “wood composite perviese (I don’t know what that word is) to moisture problems with product claims lodged in past”  Can anyone tell me if fibro planking has issues.  I googled it and I can’t find any.  All I can find is that at one time prior to 1981, it contained asbestos.  But my house was built in 1988 so my fibro doesn’t contain asbestos and I have never had moisture problems with my fibro either.  Thank you Chris Baker for your wise words of wisdom.  You amaze me – well and truly.

“light fittings require attention”.  Yes I had agreed with the prospective purchasers to remedy this.

Although Chris Baker, did not investigate issues, which he should have perhaps investigated before reporting on them, he did indeed take it upon himself to investigate my hot water cylinder.  He took it apart in order to check out the state of the element!  I never, at any time, gave him permission to do this!  His advice was the “element was corroded and would need replacing”.  You will note in the example report, that a building inspection is only “visual”, it does not include dismantling the house owners fixed appliances!

What is fact (not fiction like his report), is that before I installed a 25,000 litre water tank, I was going through elements every 8 months.  This particular element has been in there for over 3 years (and includes when I was still on town supply), so could be due for replacement.

…and while on the electrical issue, what do I even say about him quoting $3,500 for power to the garage?  Our local qualified electrican, estimated $500 with the trench dug (by my boys).  Does it cost $3,000 to dig a trench 5m long and 350 deep?  I don’t know??  You tell me!

Chris Baker, your report is a load of utter nonsense!  I hope you never do this to anyone again.  I will just leave it in the hands of Licensed Building Practitioners Board.  Your clients stand by you and you have convinced them thoroughly, so with that, you will have to live.  I have written to you twice, seeking evidence of your qualifications, both in building and electrical, I am still waiting…

The costs he has mentioned here amount to approximately $16,500 and that does not include the issues, he has left wide open like the laundry floor, and the roller sliding door (which doesn’t need repair at all).  Would you be happy with this?  Would you be jumping for joy because you lost your sale at the hands of this “specialist builder”, who guestimates what he concocts in his head?  I’m not.  I think he knows that now.

All and all, I am appalled by this completely unprofessional report on my property!  I simply cannot fathom, that the prospective purchasers had so little disregard for my integrity and believed the advice of a cowboy!  Which in my opinion, is exactly and literally what he is and exactly why a specialist report is obtained.

My advice to anyone selling their property, is be home when the “specialist” calls.  Check out his credentials (in this case it is crudentials) and ascertain that your purchasers are not employing some cowboy/story teller, and that they adhere to the signed agreement.  I did not agree to let any old person, who says he is a specialist/builder, into my home and pull it apart.

PS I have checked with LBP and Master Builders, and he is not either.  Neither is he registered as an electrician…what is he?  You decide!

I believe in justice.  In my opinion, having someone, such as Chris Baker of Bakersfield Ltd, act so unprofessionally, irrationally and destructively is not justice, it’s nothing like it and it most certainly is not what I signed up for.

Any contractor entering someone else’s home, needs to show a little more respect than this!  It is my home and I have lived there for nine years.  I know it better than any would be, if he could be super builder!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How do we stop this violence?

New Zealand has become a country of one violent offence after another, after another!  The question on my lips, is what is being done about it and how are we going to stop it?  Take a look at the young thug in the below articles!

He is a violent abuser and I am picking this is not the first time he has assaulted someone is this manner, prior to being arrested in this matter.  Do these people think that it is okay, that they can afflict serious harm on other people including women, (weak bastard) and get away with it.  From where I am sitting that is exactly what they think, and there is no disincentive not to bash someone, if they so feel like it!

Now here is one thing I understand, perhaps they were bought up in a violent environment and they are merely acting out on what they have seen.  The message needs to go out there that it is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE to behave in this manner.  Now I have voiced my opinion of some Judges in this country on a number of occasions, so I have no qualms in stating once again that their behaviour is so too, UNACCEPTABLESome Judges need their bloody heads read!  Money and prestige should never never never be regarded over and above the law.  It makes me wonder just what sort of club or organisations these Judges are involved in when it comes to making calls such as in these articles.

In the above cases, the victims are taking the matter to a higher level!  Well how absolutely ludicrous is that?!  They shouldn’t need to!

We all need to band together and let these violent scum bags and Judges (who are behaving just as cowardly and stupidly) know that we are not going to tolerate this disgusting behaviour and that they CANNOT and WILL NOT get away with it.  What the heck is wrong with our justice system?  Well for starters:

  1. we need to know that the Police will act;
  2. it needs to be identified whether the violent offender has acted alone or whether they are part of some bigger syndicate of dickheads;
  3. if they are involved in some bigger syndicate of dickheads, they need to be put away separately to them or remanded in custody, so that they cannot continue to threaten with the backing of their cowardly pussies.
  4. we need an efficient and knowledgeable prosecution team;
  5. and last but not least we need competent Judges, not merely lawyers with black gowns on who have been elected there by members of the old  boys club!

I am currently witnessing the birth of a gang who are nothing but a cowardly bunch of youths who are causing havoc and are behaving violently everywhere they go and who are continuing to get away with the behaviour!  They need calling out and the matter needs dealing with.  Do we have measures and systems in place to deal with these antisocial, cowardly little assailants who think they are tough, so tough they smash girls?  I certainly hope so, because if I have anything to do with it they are not getting away with it!  Will I go to the Police time after time, Yip I will!  Will I publish their names, so even when they are done with the Courts, they can be searched on the internet and found out for what they have done, by future employers, girlfriends or whoever.  Yip I’ll do that!  I’ve done it before and I will do it again!  So you little needle dicks.  Go near my kids or their friends and you have given yourself a life sentence.  Ask Mike Downey!



Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized


The childhood glow within, exists, remains;

Dancing, singing, running free;

energy, potential bubbling and brimming;

The young seasons into spring;

She unites, increases;

Years cascade and bubbles fade, the flute draws empty;

Autumn battles arise out from the dark, the Queen is ready;

War is fierce, she stands rock edge steady;

Flaming back arrows knock her to the ground;

Determination and Truth lift her back upon her feet ;

She roars to the East and purrs with the West

Balanced and poised, she treads with precision.

Take her or leave her, her true fire is never dimming.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Minister of Justice & Courts Endorses Crime!

Honestly, I really couldn’t be anymore disappointed or let down by our Government who have thrown New Zealand citizens to the wolves (literally)!  Anyone in the legal professional knows, very well, how difficult it is to get a perjury ruling on an affidavit!  It is actually dam near impossible!  When I put to the Court that I was nowhere near where Mike Downey (Legal Document Server) of Auckland/Dargaville (wherever) swore to serving me, the Judge said “the documents can be served by registered post”.  Our legal system is so far up the shoot it isn’t funny.  Court document service is how a person is informed there is proceedings against them, yet it is left wide open for CRIMINALS to be in the position of this VITAL role.  Thank you Minister, I can see how you have “justice and “our courts” all under control.  The Minister’s reply to my open letter is attached.  It’s sickening… Downey (criminal extraodinaire) carry on with your good work in legal document “service” you are endorsed by the Minister!


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How good is this?


Leave a comment

June 7, 2016 · 2:55 am

Open Letter to Minister of Justice & Courts: Mike Downey – Back in Business

18 May 2016

Dear Minister, Honourable Amy Adams

As you may remember, I have written to you and the former Minister, Chester Borrows on numerous occasions regarding document service and the complete lack of protection that New Zealanders have, at law, in this regard.  As a New Zealand citizen who has been severely affected by non service, I remain deeply concerned that there has been no change in legislation in respect to the laws (or should I say, lack of laws, because there are none) surrounding document service, in particular, Court document service.

I believe you will also be aware, due to my notifying you on multiple occasions, that Mike Downey (a criminal with approx 30 dishonesty related convictions) was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment because he lied in two respective false affidavits that he served me with documents when he did not.  As you know very well, Court document service is how a person is informed that Court proceedings have been issued against them.  It is law that an application must be personally served.

I attach a PDF flyer Flyer 1 that Mike Downey is distributing, which strongly suggests that he is attempting to drum up business in document service!  His 25 years experience in document service belies him!  I also attach an email dated 13 May 2016 which Downey has sent out to “potential clients” (although I will not publish that on this website to protect the recipients).

Minister, Downey went to prison, because he is a liar (a perjurer) and did not serve.  There are no laws preventing him from “serving” Court (or any) documents and innocent people are going to continue to be conned and have crime committed against them because our legislators are not doing their job!  I have said it before, and I will say it again – New Zealand needs laws regulating document servers, especially in regard to Court documentation!  Criminals in this role is criminal and absolutely unacceptable!  If it is submissions you require, I am more than happy to assist with that.

Thank you, for your attention to this matter.

Yours faithfully


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized